The Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Dacomitinib.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Dacomitinib is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations. To evaluate the effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of dacomitinib, two dedicated studies were conducted to inform optimal dosing. METHODS: Study 1 (NCT01571388) evaluated the effect of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the plasma pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability after a single oral dose of dacomitinib 30 mg, and Study 2 (NCT03865446) evaluated the same endpoints in a severe hepatic impairment population. Both studies were phase I, open-label, parallel-group studies. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with unequal variance assumption and hepatic impairment group as a fixed effect was used to compare the natural log of area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinite time (AUCinf), AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for each hepatic impairment group to the respective normal hepatic function group. Since dacomitinib is a cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 substrate, only participants with extensive or intermediate CYP2D6 phenotypes were included in the primary analysis. RESULTS: The AUCinf for participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment decreased by 6%, decreased by 23%, and increased by 4%, respectively, compared with normal hepatic function, while the Cmax for participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment increased by 3%, decreased by 20%, and increased by 31%, respectively, compared with normal hepatic function. A single oral dose of dacomitinib 30 mg was well tolerated in all participants. CONCLUSION: Based on these pharmacokinetic results, dacomitinib pharmacokinetics of participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment were not statistically different relative to participants with normal hepatic function based on the ANOVA analysis. No dacomitinib dose adjustments for patients with hepatic impairment are recommended. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01571388, registered 5 April 2012; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03865446, registered 6 March 2019.

Evaluation of the effect of P-glycoprotein inhibition and induction on talazoparib disposition in patients with advanced solid tumours.

AIMS: In vitro data show that talazoparib is a substrate for P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein transporters. This open-label, 2-arm, drug-drug interaction Phase 1 study in patients with advanced solid tumours assessed the effect of a P-gp inhibitor (itraconazole) and a P-gp inducer (rifampicin) on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of talazoparib. The safety and tolerability of a single dose of talazoparib with and without itraconazole or rifampicin were also assessed. METHODS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled (Arm A [itraconazole], n = 19; Arm B [rifampicin], n = 17). Patients in both arms received 2 single oral doses of talazoparib (0.5 mg, Arm A; 1 mg, Arm B) alone and with multiple daily oral doses of itraconazole (Arm A) or rifampicin (Arm B). RESULTS: Coadministration of itraconazole and talazoparib increased talazoparib area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinity by ~56% and maximum observed plasma concentration by ~40% relative to talazoparib alone. Coadministration of rifampicin and talazoparib increased talazoparib maximum observed plasma concentration by approximately 37% (geometric mean ratio 136.6% [90% confidence interval 103.2-180.9]); area under the curve was not affected relative to talazoparib alone (geometric mean ratio 102.0% [90% confidence interval 94.0-110.7]). Talazoparib had an overall safety profile consistent with that observed in prior studies in which talazoparib was administered as a single dose. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of itraconazole increased talazoparib plasma exposure compared to talazoparib alone. A reduced talazoparib dose is recommended if coadministration of potent P-gp inhibitors cannot be avoided. Similar exposure was observed when talazoparib was administered alone and with rifampicin suggesting that the effect of rifampicin on talazoparib exposure is limited.

A Phase 1 Mass Balance Study of 14 C-Labeled Talazoparib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors.

This paper describes the pharmacokinetics (PK), mass balance, metabolic profiling, and safety of talazoparib after a single oral dose of 14 C-talazoparib in 6 patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients were aged ≥18 years, with a histologically confirmed advanced solid tumor at screening. A single 1-mg dose of talazoparib oral solution supplemented with 100 µCi of 14 C-labeled talazoparib was administered. Blood, urine, and feces samples were collected at various time points and analyzed for talazoparib and 14 C radioactivity. Metabolic profiling and identification were also carried out. Mean recovery of 14 C radioactivity was 68.7% in urine and 19.7% in feces. Talazoparib was minimally metabolized. Renal excretion of unchanged talazoparib was a major route of elimination, with mean recovery of 54.6% of the administered dose, whereas fecal excretion of talazoparib was limited, with mean recovery of 13.6% of the administered dose. No major metabolites of talazoparib were identified in plasma, and no metabolites that individually represented more than 10% of the administered dose were recovered in urine or feces. The concentration-time profiles of unchanged talazoparib, total 14 C radioactivity in plasma, and total 14 C radioactivity in whole blood were similar, with a median time at peak concentrations of 30 minutes and mean half-life of 89.8, 96.2, and 77.6 hours, respectively. Talazoparib was minimally metabolized, and renal excretion of unchanged talazoparib was the major route of elimination.

Results of PROFILE 1029, a Phase III Comparison of First-Line Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in East Asian Patients with ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The phase III randomized PROFILE 1014 study demonstrated superiority of crizotinib to first-line chemotherapy in prolonging progression-free survival (PFS) in previously untreated patients with ALK receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK)-positive advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. This result was consistent with that in the smaller subset of East Asian patients in PROFILE 1014. The subsequent study reported here prospectively evaluated crizotinib in a larger East Asian patient population. METHODS: In this open-label phase III study (PROFILE 1029), patients were randomized 1:1 to receive orally administered crizotinib 250 mg twice daily continuously (3-week cycles) or intravenously administered chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2, or carboplatin [at a dose to produce area under the concentration-time curve of 5-6 mg·min/mL]) every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. PFS confirmed by independent radiology review was the primary end point. RESULTS: Crizotinib significantly prolonged PFS (hazard ratio, 0.402; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.286-0.565; p < 0.001). The median PFS was 11.1 months with crizotinib and 6.8 months with chemotherapy. The objective response rate was 87.5% (95% CI: 79.6-93.2%) with crizotinib versus 45.6% (95% CI: 35.8-55.7%) with chemotherapy (p < 0.001). The most common adverse events were increased transaminase levels, diarrhea, and vision disorders with crizotinib and leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia with chemotherapy. Significantly greater improvements from baseline in patient-reported outcomes were seen in crizotinib-treated versus chemotherapy-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: First-line crizotinib significantly improved PFS, objective response rate, and patient-reported outcomes compared with standard platinum-based chemotherapy in East Asian patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC, which is similar to the results from PROFILE 1014. The safety profiles of crizotinib and chemotherapy were consistent with those previously published.

Expression of ten RGS proteins in human myocardium: functional characterization of an upregulation of RGS4 in heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: RGS proteins (regulators of G protein signalling) negatively regulate G protein function as GTPase activating proteins. By controlling heterotrimeric G proteins they may regulate myocardial hypertrophy and contractility. We investigated the expression of RGS proteins in the human heart and whether they take part in the pathophysiological changes of heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using RNase protection assays (RPAs) RGS2, 3L, 3S, 4, 5 and 6 were identified in the myocardium from terminally failing human hearts with dilated (DCM, n=22) or ischemic (ICM, n=18) cardiomyopathy and from nonfailing donor hearts (NF, n=9). With reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in addition mRNA of RGS1, 9, 12, 14 and 16 were detectable. Compared to NF in failing LV myocardium RGS4 mRNA and protein was upregulated 2-3-fold (mRNA, 10(-21) mol/microg+/-S.E.M.: NF: 22+/-5, DCM: 51+/-10*, ICM: 37+/-8; P<0.05 vs. DCM+ICM, *P<0.05 vs. NF, P<0.05 vs. DCM+ICM; protein, % of NF+/-S.E.M.: NF: 100+/-35, DCM 266+/-60*, ICM: 205+/-64, n=5, *P<0.05 vs. NF). In contrast, RGS2, 3L, 3S, 5, 6, and 16 protein and mRNA levels did not vary between failing and NF hearts. In order to investigate the impact of RGS4 on Gq/11 mediated signalling, PLC activity was measured in human LV membranes. Recombinant RGS4 blunted the endothelin-1 (ET-1) stimulated PLC activity. When overexpressed by adenoviral mediated gene transfer in rabbit ventricular myocytes RGS4 abolished the inotropic effect of ET-1. CONCLUSION: The upregulation of RGS4 in failing human myocardium diminishes Gq/11-mediated signalling and can be involved in the desensitization of Gq/11-mediated positive inotropic effects.